There and back again
Daniel Muller, (a dear soul, regarding whom I repeat that he really should start his own web journal), has gently requested that I start writing again.
Sorry, folks, but I have been a trifle busy these past two weeks. Among other things, I have had to write both a Petition for Writ of Certiorari and a Request for a Stay of Proceedings before the United States Supreme Court. The Petition was filed, but unfortunately, the Request for Stay was denied, after a desperate week of amending and resubmitting the Request in order to meet procedural requirements. For reasons of confidentiality, I cannot write much further, other than to say that as a result of the denial, I will probably be laid off from my job as a paralegal in a couple of weeks.
Two weeks ago, also, my wife went in for a mammogram. The results were sufficiently disturbing that last Monday she went in for a needle biopsy. At that time, she was told that she had a 6 cm mammary lobular carcinoma, and that it was likely (because of the size of the tumor) that it had metastasized.
After a week of a series of tests (e.g., bilateral mammary ultrasounds, bilateral mammary CT scans, full CT scan, barium swallow, bone scan, and subsequent bilateral placement of radiomarkers for later surgery) that made the rack seem like a walk in the park, we learned this Monday that there was no metastasis, and no bone or lymph involvement.
Yesterday, she went in for chemotherapy (the beginning of an eight week course of Adriamycin and Cytoxin, administered every other week, with a later eight week course of Taxol planned). The oncologist believes that with chemo and radiation, there is a 60% chance that the tumor may shrink to a size and condition that would make lumpectomy, rather than radical mastectomy, appropriate.
It appears that the chemotherapy will probably cost $30K in toto, and after insurance, our share will come to $6K, which we can ill afford. It is grimly amusing to consider that if we did not have medical insurance, it would be cheaper by far to take cruises every two weeks to Ensenada, Mexico, and have the chemotherapy administered there. It is also vaguely amusing to consider that the one rationale justifying the exorbitant expense (that is, research costs) is not present here, as all of the drug research for Taxol, etc., came from grants from the National Institute of Health, and presumably, was funded by tax dollars. These amusing thoughts are driving a long-time Libertarian to thoughts of nationalization of U.S. pharmaceutical companies. A pity that there are more drug lobbyists that there are members of the Senate and Congress combined.
I write this now so that those who are reading my little ditty may pray that my wife recover. Her name is Elizabeth.
I am informed by Mr. Muller that his secretary is disturbed by the Spongmonkeys, and that he requests that the profile be changed. I hope that she will be satisfied with the change. After all, who could be upset by bunnies?
5 Comments:
So much difficult news! I hope that you are able to collect some recommendations and find another good job soon.
And it will not be difficult to remember Elizabeth Brandt. That sounds like the name of a novelist ... or someone Really Important, which of course is what she is.
Oremus pro invicem.
I am afraid you have fallen off the incredible roller coaster ride, though, when you speak of nationalizing the pharmaceutical companies. Government in the drug wholesaling business ... the mind boggles!
Every Friday is Technology Day at the office, so we may soon find out what the secretary (not my secretary, unfortunately, just a helpful secretary -- a "catalyst" in videoworkbookteambuilding terms -- who works across the hall) thinks about bunny stars.
Daniel Muller
Peace, my friend.
Your wife will certainly be in my prayers.
The best solutions for health care might elude us at the moment. Never having been a citizen of a country with nationalized health care, I'm not sure what would be so bad about it. But being at the mercy of the profit motive is no picnic.
Dear Daniel and Todd:
Thank you for your kind words, and for your offers of prayers. As I have remarked to others, the prayers of the righteous avail much.
Regarding the pharmaceutical companies and thoughts of nationalization, yeah, its kind of like my growing debate with myself regarding capital punishment. On the one hand, as Plato said, to reward evil with evil is not the act of a wise man. But on the other hand, on viewing some of the two-legged vermin on this earth who kill the innocent without remorse, it makes me want to say (or have the State say to them): "You! Out of the gene pool!"
In like mode, I recall one time on Nova, after the discoverers of the (alas, temporary) curative effects of L-Dopamine on victims of Parkinson's disease made their discovery, one of them was spooning out the remains of a one kilogram jar of the stuff in the course of further experiments, and said that he was glad that they had bought the jar (for $50.00) a year before publishing their findings. After the report was published, he explained, the price went up to $17,500.00 per kilogram.
While little things like this drive me to thoughts of nationalization (or summary execution for certain executives), I am reminded of little organizations like NASA, and what happens to initiative and discovery in the fields they control when they become entrenched as bureaucracies. Ah, well.
You and your wife will be in my prayers.
God bless.
Yours,
Geri
I was disappointed that the secretary did not type in a response, but she was making way for the receptionist, whose desk she had been covering, when we watched the "double feature." Yes, she definitely preferred the bunnies.
I was glad to see the famous bunnies at last -- until Friday, I had been sure that I was the last person connected to the Internet to have seen them -- but frankly I think that "We like the MOON" is wonderful.
Thanks.
Daniel Muller
Post a Comment
<< Home